| 1 2 3 Next |
Microsoft Corporation Flight Simulator X Gold Edition - PC (EGC-00001)
- From: CNET
- Posted: Sep-21-2008
"Huge, Bloated piece of Crap."
Was looking forward to seeing a refined version of FS9 but was disappointed to find out that I now need to buy a CRAY just to run this program adequately.
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Mar-28-2008
"Absouloutly Amazing,"
Absouloutly Amazing, and it comes from mocrosoft i have a basic graphics card 2 g ram and the specs ar all very high and it runs smooth as liquid 1.5 g's of ram would also work fine
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Dec-30-2007
"Total con. Aces/MS are lieing"
PLEASE, do not but this. Aces studios have completly mis-represented this title. It does NOTHING it claims too, and is a complete waste of time. On a machine with 3x + the minium specs, latest G-card, Quad core, 4 gig of ram, it will run like crap. f
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Oct-20-2007
"Mixed Emotions"
This product is not one that can be deemed "computer friendly" whatsoever! I am certainly not saying that it is a poor simulator; on the contrary, it is very good. However, you better make sure that you have at least a mid to fair range computer, i.e
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Sep-02-2007
"Nice game but to much unreal"
In flight simulator X earth is a realy wonderfull ball, but i dont mind about it! They put all the work on planet and put low work on realism and aircraft. I think it's just a total fail from Microsoft. I don't give a **** about animal going down i j
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Jul-12-2007
"Pure Fun for the newcomer!"
It's been many years since I've owned MS FS. So, I don't have the comparison that those who own FS 2004 have. This is a wonderful product. Anyone who is new to flight simulation will certainly learn and love it. Experienced flyers may have other
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Jun-02-2007
"Does not live to expectation"
The game has a few pros. I love the side view behind the wing, this is great. I also like the added functionality in the virtual cockpit view. Unfortunately these features do not outweight the high demand for processing power that is required. Person
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Apr-02-2007
"Extremely Disappointed"
I also am an avid FS fan and have owned every version. This is an embarrassment to Microsoft. It absolutely doesn't compare to FS 2004 and all the wonderfully generous add-ons people post on Avsim, FlightSim etc. Not only is the framerate terrible
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Mar-18-2007
"I've Ran Microsoft Flight Sim X on Vista and XP"
Best Flight Simulator Yet But did Have a few performance Issues on both xp sp2 and Vista.
Read full review | Report as inappropriate- From: CNET
- Posted: Mar-16-2007
"It really sucks"
Even at the highest level of scenery detail, the bridges are just skeletons with no detail. FS 2002 was far superior. For example: The Ambassador bridge between Windsor Canada and Detroit USA The game requires a very good graphics card and a ton of
Read full review | Report as inappropriate



