A Matter of Fax Reviews

We are committed to providing quality service and keeping our customers' needs first! Avoid long lines and crowds, use this site and enjoy shopping in the comfort of your own home! Get a detailed description of any computer item at a great low price and even get in touch with a customer service representative via e-mail any time, day or night!
|
From: Epinions
Reviewed by:bclevlnd
Posted:Aug 28, 2008
|
Never again...I ordered a replacement lamp for my TV through A Matter Of Fax on Tuesday 8/18. I received the confirmation back from them and the money was taken out of my account. I eagerly awaited the tracking information (it said 24-48 hours), but none came that |
![]() Overall Rating:
![]() |
|
From: Yahoo! Shopping
Reviewed by:brianbumgar
Posted:Aug 22, 2008
|
PoorI ordered a replacement lamp for my lcd projection tv. The item was instock online and i paid additional to have item shipped and at my house in 6 or less days. After I ordered and paid for the item i received an email two days later saying it would |
![]() Overall Rating:
![]() |
|
From: Epinions
Reviewed by:three_ster
Posted:Jul 31, 2008
|
They got my product to me; But I won't be using them againI have only used the web-site for A Matter of Fax one time, and I think that will end up being the last time that I do. We went through the site originally, thinking that it would be easy to purchase a couple of products on there that were |
![]() Overall Rating:
![]() |
|
From: NexTag
Reviewed by:firstrockford
Posted:Jul 16, 2008
|
"Great prices, great shipping. The only thing I find odd is that the day I receive notification that my package has sent (with tracking number), is the day I receive the package. I'm glad I got it so promptly, but I think the notification is... |
![]() Overall Rating:
![]() |
|
From: Epinions
Reviewed by:paulc090
Posted:Jul 11, 2008
|
This store is terrible. Do not purchase anything from them. My purchase finally came after 2 weeks and the box was in bad shape with no outer box, and the UPC code had been removed. I opened it up to find a used scanner that was in less than new cond |
![]() Overall Rating:
![]() |






